Irrelevant?

Security issue related to Unix and Unix applications

Irrelevant?

Postby Quaon » Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:23 am

Since Unix is completely open sourced, and new add ons are available every day, isnt the idea of unix security irrelevant? One second there could be a hole, and the next, its fixed. Or am I mistaken?
User avatar
Quaon
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Advertisement

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby phiber » Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:40 am

does anybody remember the phf bug back from the... ninetees? :)
it is still out there, although some servers have it faked on purpose.

But to stay on-topic... for ex.: linux kernels lately have local privilege escalation vulnerabilities. The nature of this vulnerabilities is that they are harder to exploit, therefore... security has been tightened. Firefox is widely-used-professionally-developed software which in version 2.0.0.4 allows a malicious site to read stored passwords.

I'm sure nobody will get my 2 cents :-)
User avatar
phiber
Site Admin
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 10:26 pm
Location: Cakovec, Croatia

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby Quaon » Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:09 pm

Hypothetically, if the kernal was completely protected, then wouldnt virus's have to be written for a speific computer? Like I said before, since there are a million different combinations for the different versions, wouldnt it be impossible to write a virus for any of the linux machines? Assuming the kernal is completely protected of course.
User avatar
Quaon
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby phiber » Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:07 pm

Quaon wrote:Like I said before, since there are a million different combinations for the different versions, wouldnt it be impossible to write a virus for any of the linux machines? Assuming the kernal is completely protected of course.


Got your point but it all comes down to what one would define as "virus".
User avatar
phiber
Site Admin
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 10:26 pm
Location: Cakovec, Croatia

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby Quaon » Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:37 pm

In this case, lets assume the purpose of the virus is to erase your hard drive from a remote location. On a windows it would be standard, since all the Windows users are using the exact same thing. But wouldn't a virus have to written for a specific machine if it was using Linux?
User avatar
Quaon
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby G-Brain » Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:02 pm

Quaon wrote:In this case, lets assume the purpose of the virus is to erase your hard drive from a remote location. On a windows it would be standard, since all the Windows users are using the exact same thing. But wouldn't a virus have to written for a specific machine if it was using Linux?

Yes it would, Unix's power and security is in it's ability to be able to be customized. - What a sentence.
G-Brain
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:21 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby Quaon » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:29 am

Would any of you smart people know how to access that information from a remote windows station? Or is that impossible/
User avatar
Quaon
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby phiber » Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:53 am

you mean, like the way you could do that with malformed gif and jpegs?
User avatar
phiber
Site Admin
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 10:26 pm
Location: Cakovec, Croatia

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby Quaon » Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:41 am

Im talking about knowing exactly what addons they have for their unix machine.
User avatar
Quaon
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Re: Irrelevant?

Postby muto » Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:15 pm

Well, if they're running a unix webserver, you can often see what addons they've got. Other than that, you can't really find out much about a unix box remotly. nmap might show you what they're running.

However, although *NIX systems can be highly customized, the core of the system is always going to be simllar. The main reason for *NIX being virus free is not the fact that each install is different, but from the fact it was built with security in mind. Almost no-one runs as root, which massivly limits what a virus can do from the start, and combined with the fact that need to chmod stuff to +x before it'll even execute also helps.

THC's amap might also be useful in enumeration...
muto
Power Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:46 am

Next

Return to Unix Security Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


  • Advertisement